Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Know the core difference between Playwright & Selenium and when to use which for web browser automation

March 28, 2025 30 min read
Get Started free
Playwright-vs-Selenium-Which-to-choose-in-2024
Home Guide Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Test Automation Frameworks are vital in automated testing Websites. Playwright and Selenium are among the most popular test automation frameworks.

While Playwright is a newer Framework, Selenium is a legacy Library which has been supporting browser automation. Playwright supports Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit browsers, while Selenium offers a wide variety of browser support with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Edge, Opera, and Safari making it ideal for Cross Browser Testing.

This article covers Playwright vs Selenium in detail to help you choose the most appropriate framework for your website test automation.

Playwright vs Selenium Comparison

Below are the key differences between Playwright and Selenium

CriteriaPlaywrightSelenium
LanguageSupports multiple languages such as JavaScript, Java, Python, and .NET C#Supports multiple languages such as Java, Python, C#, Ruby, Perl, PHP, and JavaScript
Ease of InstallationEasy to InstallEasy to Install
Test Runner Frameworks SupportedMocha, Jest, JasmineSelenium is a library and can be used with Test runners like JUnit, TestNG, NUnit etc.
Trace ViewerComes with Trace viewer to run and debug tests which is very convenient and Powerful toolNo Such features and depends completely on Test Runner to debug and execute tests
PrerequisitesNodeJS should be installedJava, Eclipse IDE, SeleniumStandalone Server, Client Language Bindings, and Browser Drivers should be installed
Operating Systems SupportedWindows, Linux, and Mac OSWindows, Linux, Solaris, and Mac OS
Open SourceOpen Source and FreeOpen Source and Free
ArchitectureHeadless Browser with event-driven architectureLayered Architecture based on JSON Wire Protocol but also support Headless Browsers
Browsers SupportedChromium, Firefox, and WebKitChrome, Firefox, IE, Edge, Opera, Safari, and more
SupportSince Playwright is fairly new, the support from the community is limited as compared to SeleniumProvides commercial support for its users via its sponsors in Selenium Ecosystem and self-support documents. Strong community support from professionals across the world
Real Devices SupportSupports real device clouds and remote serversSupports real device clouds and remote servers

What is Playwright?

Playwright

Playwright by Microsoft is the newest addition to the Headless Browser Testing frameworks in popular use. Built by the same team that created Puppeteer (Headless Browser Testing Framework for Google Chrome), Playwright is an open-source NodeJS-based framework.

  • However, it provides wider coverage for cross-browser testing by supporting Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, while Puppeteer only supports Chrome and Chromium browsers.
  • Playwright is compatible with Windows, Linux, and macOS, and can be integrated with major CI/CD servers such as Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure Pipeline, TravisCI, etc. in addition to the testing frameworks like Jest, Jasmine, Mocha.
  • Besides JavaScript, Playwright also supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Java, and .NET C#, giving more options to QAs writing test scripts.
  • It is highly useful for cross-browser testing on complex applications due to its wide coverage, accuracy, and high speed. It offers end-to-end testing through its high-level API, allowing the tester to control headless browsers.

When the tester runs a Playwright test script, the UI is readied at the backend before the test interacts with web elements. While testers have to write code for the wait explicitly for other frameworks, Playwright ensures auto wait, making it easier to write concise test scripts.

It also provides flexible testing through its capabilities, which cover a wide range of complex scenarios for comprehensive testing.

  • The auto-wait feature in Playwright performs all relevant checks for an element, and the requested action is performed only when the checks are duly passed. This ensures that the parts perform as expected and the test results are more accurate.
  • Some actionability checks performed by Playwright include Attached, Visible, Stable, Receive Events, and Enabled.
  • Playwright also supports the execution of simultaneous tests (AKA parallel testing) through Browser Context. This scales up testing and comes in handy when multiple web pages must be tested simultaneously.

Here one browser instance is used to create multiple, concurrent and isolated browser contexts, which can be closed when not needed. Each of these browser contexts could host multiple web pages simultaneously. Thus, scaling up when the volume is high and reducing it when not required ensures optimal usage of resources.

Also Read: Headless Browser Testing With Selenium Python

How to run Playwright tests

While Playwright launches browsers in the headless mode by default, it can also run the browsers in headful mode. By passing a flag, when the browser is launched, Playwright can be used to run browsers in headful mode for tests.

The following code can be used to launch a headful browser:

const { chromium } = require('playwright'); 

//to launch the headful browser for firefox and webkit, replace chromium by firefox and webkit

const browser = await chromium.launch({ headless: false });
Copied

For Linux systems, xvfb is essential for launching headful browsers. Since xvfb is pre-installed in Docker Image and Github Action, running xvfb before the Node.js command allows the browsers to run in the headful mode.

xvfb-run node index.js
Copied

Also Read: Headless Browser Testing with NightwatchJS

What is Selenium?

Selenium Logo

Selenium is an open-source automation testing suite that is widely used for the automation testing of web applications. It automates browsers and interacts with UI elements to replicate user actions to test whether a web application is functioning as expected.

Through its single interface, the Selenium framework allows the tester to write test scripts in different languages such as Java, Ruby, Perl, C#, NodeJS, Python, and PHP, offering flexibility.

  • Selenium supports a wide range of browsers and their different versions to enable cross browser testing of web applications.
  • It is the most popular framework to test websites and ensure seamless and consistent user experiences across different browser and device combinations.
  • That is why Selenium is one of the most trusted automated testing suites in the software industry.

Must Read: Headless Browser Testing with Selenium: Tutorial

How to run Selenium Tests

Selenium launches browsers in headed mode by default, you can also launch the browser in headless mode by passing the arguments to chromeoptions().

Example to launch browser in headed mode

WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
driver.get("https://www.bstackdemo.com/")
Copied

Example to launch browser in headless mode

ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();

options.addArguments("--headless=new");
WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
driver.get("https://www.bstackdemo.com/");
Copied

First initialize an object of ChromeOptions() and then add the argument “–headless=new” which is then passed to ChromeDriver.

BrowserStack Automate Banner 8

Key Differences in Playwright vs Selenium: Explained

Selenium and Playwright are both powerful web automation tools, but they differ in architecture, speed, browser support, and community adoption. While Selenium has been the industry standard for years, Playwright offers modern features and faster execution.

Choosing between them depends on your testing needs, such as language support, execution speed, and real device testing. Below are the key differences:

  • Architecture: Selenium uses the WebDriver API and HTTP requests, while Playwright relies on a persistent WebSocket connection, making it faster and more efficient.
  • Browser Support: Selenium supports a wider range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera, whereas Playwright supports Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit.
  • Execution Speed: Playwright’s WebSocket-based communication reduces latency and speeds up test execution, whereas Selenium’s HTTP-based approach can be slower.
  • Language Support: Selenium supports Java, Python, C#, Ruby, PHP, and JavaScript, while Playwright primarily supports JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, C#, and Java.
  • Real Device Testing: Selenium integrates with real device clouds for mobile and desktop testing, whereas Playwright primarily offers native mobile emulation with limited real device support.
  • Headless Testing: Playwright is designed with built-in headless browser support, whereas Selenium requires additional configuration for headless execution.
  • Community and Ecosystem: Selenium has a larger, well-established community with extensive documentation, while Playwright, being newer, has a smaller but rapidly growing community.
  • Test Runner and Frameworks: Selenium supports popular frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and WebDriverIO, while Playwright is commonly used with Jest, Mocha, and Vitest.
  • Integration with CI/CD: Both Selenium and Playwright integrate with CI/CD tools, but Playwright offers more seamless integration with modern DevOps workflows.
  • Ease of Setup: Selenium requires setting up browser drivers and language bindings, whereas Playwright has a simpler setup with built-in browser binaries.

Learn More: Jest vs Mocha: Comparing NodeJS Unit Testing Frameworks

Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose?

Both Playwright and Selenium have advantages and limitations, which means choosing between them is subjective to the scenario they will be used for. It depends on the project requirements and the priorities to choose one among these two testing frameworks.

When to Use Selenium

  1. Wide Browser Compatibility: Selenium supports various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, Edge, and Opera. It is ideal for testing across multiple browsers, including older versions.
  2. Established and Mature Projects: Selenium is a well-established tool with a large community, extensive documentation, and numerous integrations. It is suitable for projects that need stability and extensive support.
  3. Language Flexibility: Selenium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. It is useful if your team has expertise in a specific language or needs to integrate tests into an existing project using a specific language.
  4. Existing Selenium Infrastructure: If your project already has a Selenium test suite and infrastructure, it may be more practical to continue using Selenium rather than switching to a new tool.

When to Use Playwright

  1. Testing Modern Web Applications: Playwright is designed to test modern web apps, supporting all modern rendering engines (Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox). It handles complex scenarios involving multiple tabs, frames, and web workers efficiently.
  2. Trace Viewer: Playwright Trace Viewer is a GUI tool that helps you explore recorded Playwright traces after the script has run. Traces are a great way for debugging your tests when they fail on CI. You can open traces locally or in your browser on trace.playwright.dev.
  3. Headless Browser Testing: Playwright has built-in support for headless browser testing, which is often faster and more efficient for CI/CD pipelines. While Selenium also supports headless mode, Playwright’s implementation is more streamlined.
  4. Handling Complex Interactions: Playwright offers advanced features such as automatic waiting, network interception, and support for multiple pages/tabs, making it easier to write tests for complex user interactions.
  5. Consistent API Across Browsers: Playwright’s API is consistent across all supported browsers, which simplifies cross-browser testing and maintenance.
  6. Parallel Test Execution: Playwright supports running tests concurrently across multiple browsers and contexts, making it faster and more efficient for large test suites unless like Selenium where we need to set up Selenium Grid to run the tests in parallel.

Talk to an Expert

Why Run Selenium and Playwright Tests on Real Devices

Here’s why you should run Selenium or Playwright Tests on Real Devices using BrowserStack Automate:

  • Diverse Environment Testing: It enables the execution of Selenium or Playwright tests across a broad selection of browsers and operating systems, eliminating the necessity for maintaining local testing infrastructure. This ensures consistent application performance across various platforms.
  • Concurrent Test Execution: By allowing simultaneous execution of multiple Selenium or Playwright test suites, BrowserStack Automate significantly cuts down on total testing time, facilitating quicker iterative feedback and accelerated deployment cycles.
  • CI/CD Integration: The platform seamlessly integrates with major continuous integration and delivery systems, including Jenkins, Travis CI, CircleCI, and GitHub Actions, automating the testing process within the development pipeline.
  • Diagnostic Tools for better debugging: BrowserStack provides comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, including detailed logs, screenshots, and video recordings of test sessions, aiding in the swift identification and resolution of issues.
  • Testing on Real Devices: Beyond simulated environments, BrowserStack also supports testing on real devices and browsers on the cloud, offering more precise and real-world test outcomes.
  • Customizable Test Execution: Users can tailor test executions to meet specific needs through BrowserStack’s user interface or APIs, enabling adaptable and controlled test runs.

Useful Resources for Selenium

Methods, Classes, and Commands

Configuration

XPath

Locators and Selectors

Waits in Selenium

Frameworks in Selenium

Miscellaneous

Best Practices, Tips and Tricks

Design Patterns in Selenium: Page Object Model and Page Factory

Action Class

TestNG and Selenium

JUnit and Selenium

Use Cases

Types of Testing with Selenium

Useful Resources for Playwright

Tool Comparisons:

Try Automation Testing on Cloud

Conclusion

No matter which test automation framework is chosen, cross browser testing is mandatory. It is the only way to guarantee that the website delivers seamless and consistent UX, irrespective of the device and browser used to access them.

  • However, Emulators and simulators simply do not offer the real user conditions for testing software.
  • Consider testing websites and apps on a real device cloud, preferably one that offers the latest devices, browsers, and OS versions.
  • This applies to both manual testing and automation testing.
    BrowserStack’s real device cloud provides 3500+ real browsers and devices for an instant, on-demand testing.
  • It also provides a cloud Selenium grid for automated testing, which can be accelerated by 10X with parallel testing.
  • The cloud also provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools such as Jira, Jenkins, TeamCity, Travis CI, and more.
  • Additionally, in-built debugging tools let testers identify and resolve bugs immediately.
Tags
Playwright Selenium

On This Page

Automation Tests on Real Devices & Browsers
Seamlessly Run Automation Tests on 3500+ real Devices & Browsers
Differences between Puppeteer and Selenium
Puppeteer vs Selenium: Core Differences
people-read-guide
Appium vs Selenium: Choosing the Right Automation Tool

Learn the key differences between Selenium and Appium the two most popular test automation frameworks used by teams to streamline their test process.
people-read-guide
Best Practices for Selenium Test Automation

For reliable test automation results, efficient test scripts are a must. Learn about the best practices in Selenium that are required for building efficient and robust test scripts.