Top 15 Accessibility Automation Tools

Accessibility testing has become a non-negotiable part of the web development lifecycle. With 16% of the global population living with some form of disability, ensuring websites are accessible is critical—not only from an ethical standpoint but also due to increasing legal requirements like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 508, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), and more.

Accessibility automation tools allow developers to ensure that websites cater to all users, including those with visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive impairments.
This guide explores various accessibility automation testing tools and how these can help overcome the common challenges in web accessibility.

What Are Accessibility Automation Tools?

Accessibility automation tools are specialized software solutions designed to evaluate web applications for compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. They automatically detect issues such as:

• Missing alt text
• Low contrast
• Improper heading structures
• Non-descriptive link texts.

Choosing an accessibility automation tool depends on several factors:

• Compliance: Tools must support standards like WCAG, ADA, and Section 508.
• Integration: Ability to fit into CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing.
• Customization: The option to define custom rulesets based on project-specific requirements.

Manual vs Automated Accessibility Testing

Manual accessibility testing involves human testers, often using assistive technologies, like screen readers, to assess if the site content is fully usable by those with disabilities. While this method is critical for testing user experience nuances, it can be time-consuming and prone to oversight.

On the other hand, automated accessibility testing tools provide scalable solutions that can quickly analyze large websites for common accessibility issues. These tools automate tests and deliver results instantly, making them essential for continuous development workflows. However, the limitations of automated tools lie in their inability to evaluate user experience factors such as keyboard navigation usability.

To balance these problems, a hybrid approach is recommended, where automated tools handle bulk testing, and manual testing validates the finer points. Platforms like BrowserStack Accessibility, which offer integrated accessibility testing features, allow developers to perform both manual and automated tests across various devices and browsers​.

Website Accessibility Checklist

A website accessibility checklist is a detailed guide that helps ensure all web content is accessible to users, regardless of their abilities. These checklists are based on standards like WCAG 2.1 and include several key aspects:

1. Text Alternatives: Ensure all non-text content (images, buttons, etc.) have alt text or ARIA labels.
2. Keyboard Navigation: Verify that all functionality can be accessed via the keyboard alone without requiring a mouse.
3. Color Contrast: Ensure sufficient contrast between foreground and background colors to improve readability for low-vision users.
4. Headings and Labels: Use proper HTML heading tags (<h1>, <h2>, etc.) for structuring content, making it easier for screen readers to interpret.
5. Forms: Ensure that form elements have associated labels and that validation messages are accessible.
6. Multimedia Content: Provide transcripts or captions for all audio and video content.
7. Error Identification: Ensure that errors are easily identifiable and include accessible instructions for correction.

These checklists can be applied manually or integrated into automated testing workflows to ensure consistent adherence to accessibility standards.

Top 15 Accessibility Automation Tools

1. BrowserStack Accessibility

BrowserStack Accessibility is a powerful solution designed to streamline accessibility testing within the broader suite of BrowserStack’s cloud-based testing platform. As part of the growing demand for accessible websites, BrowserStack has integrated accessibility testing tools that are highly technical, scalable, and reliable for both developers and QA teams.

Key Features:

• Comprehensive Web Accessibility Compliance
  Easily scan your website to establish a baseline for WCAG compliance and set up recurring scans to monitor and maintain accessibility standards over time.
• Faster Workflow Scans
  Workflow Analyzer speeds up your testing process. It enables you to detect issues like missing alt text and color contrast deficiencies in real-time. Test multiple user workflows in a single scan.
• Automated Accessibility Testing
  Seamlessly integrate accessibility testing into your regression suites using BrowserStack’s SDK. Automate effortlessly, with no build maintenance required, and receive auto-generated reports.
• Precise Issue Tracking and Smart Prioritization
  Automatically prioritize unique issues by grouping them based on type, affected components, and WCAG violations. Use test workflow logs to pinpoint the exact source of issues.

• Assisted Tests with Expert Guidance
  Identify complex issues with ease, such as keyboard navigation errors, and missing or misconfigured Accessibility Names, Roles, and States, using Assisted Tests.
• Real-Time Screen Reader Access
  Test with screen readers like VoiceOver, NVDA, and TalkBack on real devices to ensure your website is accessible across platforms.
• Centralized Smart Reporting and Debugging
  Instantly access and combine reports from previous test runs via a central reporting dashboard, with insightful issue summaries and smart WCAG mapping to save time on VPAT creation.
• Instant Setup
  Get started with zero setup hassles, smart reporting features, and a central dashboard to store and view all your reports. Automate your accessibility checks with ease and efficiency.

Why Choose BrowserStack for Accessibility Testing

Here’s why you must choose BrowserStack for accessibility testing:

• Seamless Integration with Developer Workflow
  Integrate easily with CI/CD pipelines using tools like GitHub Actions. Run accessibility audits with every code commit, with automated reports and real-time feedback.
• Scalability and Flexibility
  Test hundreds or thousands of pages, no matter the size of your project. BrowserStack’s tools adapt to complex websites with dynamic content and multi-language support.
• Industry-Standard Compliance
  Ensure your site meets WCAG 2.1, Section 508, and ADA standards using Lighthouse. Create an accessible experience for all users, regardless of disabilities.
• Global and Real Device Testing
  Test accessibility on real devices across multiple regions. BrowserStack’s global infrastructure ensures localized testing for a wide range of accessibility guidelines.
• Comprehensive Reporting
  Receive detailed, actionable reports that highlight and prioritize accessibility issues. Use analytics tools to make data-driven decisions on the most critical fixes.

Talk to an Expert

2. WAVE (Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool)

WAVE is a suite of evaluation tools developed by WebAIM (Web Accessibility in Mind) to help developers and content creators make their web content more accessible. It works as both an automated tool and a manual testing aid, offering real-time feedback on a website’s accessibility performance.

Key Features:

• WCAG Compliance Check: WAVE provides detailed reports on how well a webpage conforms to WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
• Visual Feedback: Highlights accessibility issues directly on the web page for easier identification and correction.
• Browser Extension: Available as an extension for Chrome and Firefox, WAVE integrates seamlessly into the browser for real-time audits.
• Detailed Error Reporting: Categorizes errors into structural issues, contrast problems, and missing alternative text.

Pros:

• Easy to use for non-developers.
• Visual interface makes it easy to pinpoint issues directly on the web page.
• Free for basic use.

Cons:

• Limited scalability for large websites or complex web apps.
• Lacks in-depth integration with CI/CD pipelines, making it less ideal for automation-heavy workflows.

3. Pa11y

Pa11y is an open-source accessibility testing tool that helps web developers automate accessibility checks for their web projects. Unlike tools like WAVE or Lighthouse, Pa11y is designed to fit into a CI/CD workflow, making it a go-to choice for development teams looking to automate compliance.

Key Features:

• CLI and Dashboard: Pa11y offers a command-line interface (CLI) for scripting tests and a dashboard for visual reporting.
• Custom Rulesets: Allows developers to set custom accessibility rules and run them across web applications.
• Integration with Jenkins and TravisCI: Pa11y works seamlessly with continuous integration tools, making it a great fit for teams automating their test processes.
• Reports: Provides clear and detailed reports, breaking down accessibility issues with solutions.

Pros:

• Completely free and open-source.
• Flexible and customizable, making it a favorite for developers.
• Excellent for automating tests and integrating into a CI/CD pipeline.

Cons:

• Requires technical knowledge to set up and operate.
• Lacks some of the visual features of WAVE and other tools, making it harder for non-developers to use.

4. Lighthouse

Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool developed by Google that is built into Chrome’s DevTools. It is primarily used to improve the quality of web pages by running audits on performance, SEO, Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), and accessibility. Lighthouse has become one of the leading tools for accessibility automation, with a focus on providing developers with actionable reports.

Key Features:

• WCAG Compliance Audit: Provides a full accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1 standards, covering everything from ARIA attributes to color contrast issues.
• Real-time Audits: Run audits directly in Chrome’s DevTools or via the command line.
• Integration: Works with other development tools such as Jenkins and GitHub Actions for automated audits in CI/CD.
• Performance Metrics: In addition to accessibility, Lighthouse also provides insights into site speed, SEO, and performance.

Pros:

• Free and built into Chrome, making it easy to access.
• Detailed, actionable reports.
• Continuously updated by Google, ensuring adherence to the latest web standards.

Cons:

• Limited customization compared to Pa11y or Tenon.
• Cannot fully replace manual testing as it lacks user-experience-specific evaluations.

5. Tenon

Tenon is an accessibility testing tool designed for developers and QA teams. It provides both automated testing capabilities and a robust API for custom integrations, making it suitable for enterprise-level development teams. Tenon focuses heavily on WCAG 2.1 compliance and offers detailed error reports, complete with remediation suggestions.

Key Features:

• Detailed Error Reports: Offers in-depth reports with guidance on how to fix detected issues.
• API and Integration: Tenon provides an API for custom integrations with various development environments, making it highly versatile.
• Real-time Feedback: Continuously monitors web pages for accessibility issues, providing real-time feedback to developers.
• Usability Reports: Focuses not just on technical errors but also on improving usability for people with disabilities.

Pros:

• Great for integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
• Comprehensive reporting with actionable suggestions.
• Customizable for different development needs.

Cons:

• Requires a subscription for full functionality.
• More complex than some simpler, free tools like WAVE or Lighthouse, requiring more time to set up and use.

6. Accessibility Insights

Accessibility Insights is an open-source tool from Microsoft designed to assist developers in finding and fixing accessibility issues. It provides both fast, automated checks and more detailed manual testing workflows to ensure websites and applications meet accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1.

Key Features:

• FastPass: Runs a quick automated scan that identifies common accessibility issues within a few seconds.
• Assessment: A detailed workflow for comprehensive manual testing of all WCAG compliance issues.
• Visualizations: Offers color-coded visual cues that help developers locate accessibility violations directly on the web page or application.
• Supports Web and Windows Apps: In addition to web testing, Accessibility Insights supports accessibility testing for Windows apps.
• Integration with CI/CD: Integrates into pipelines, helping teams maintain accessibility in agile environments.

Pros:

• Strong support for manual testing workflows.
• Visual aids for better issue identification.
• Completely free and open-source.

Cons:

• Primarily suited for Windows and web testing, lacks native support for other platforms like mobile.
• It is not as scalable as enterprise-level solutions like BrowserStack.

7. tota11y

Developed by Khan Academy, tota11y is a simple, open-source accessibility tool that allows developers to visually highlight accessibility issues on their websites. It focuses more on educating developers about web accessibility by showing them exactly where problems lie.

Key Features:

• Visual Overlay: Adds a toolbar to your website that visually highlights accessibility issues in real-time.
• Interactive Interface: Provides feedback on common accessibility issues, including missing alt text, contrast errors, and ARIA label issues.
• Extensible: Developers can extend its functionality to include custom checks.
• On-the-Fly Testing: Run checks directly in the browser without complex setups or integration with other tools.

Pros:

• Easy to set up and use for beginners.
• Focuses on educational feedback, helping developers understand accessibility issues better.
• Free and open-source.

Cons:

• Not as feature-rich or detailed as other professional-grade accessibility testing tools.
• Lacks automation capabilities for CI/CD workflows, limiting its use in large-scale projects.

8. HTML_CodeSniffer

HTML_CodeSniffer is a JavaScript-based tool that checks HTML source code against various web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, Section 508, and W3C guidelines. It is easy to integrate with websites and provides immediate feedback on compliance issues.

Key Features:

• On-Demand Testing: This can be run directly in the browser as a bookmarklet, providing instant feedback on any webpage.
• Customizable Standards: Allows testing against multiple standards, including WCAG 2.0/2.1 and Section 508.
• Detailed Error Reporting: Categorizes issues into levels like A, AA, or AAA based on their severity.
• Comprehensive Coverage: Tests for a wide range of accessibility issues, from basic HTML structure to more advanced ARIA compliance.

Pros:

• Simple to use with immediate feedback.
• Covers a broad range of accessibility standards.
• Free and open-source.

Cons:

• Lacks integration with CI/CD pipelines, limiting automated testing capabilities.
• Primarily focuses on front-end HTML code, lacking deeper integration into modern web app frameworks.

9.A11y Machine

A11y Machine is an open-source, command-line accessibility testing tool. It scans entire websites for accessibility issues and generates comprehensive reports. It can be integrated within continuous integration (CI) systems to automate the testing process.

Key Features:

• Automated Website Crawling: Scans multiple web pages across an entire site for accessibility issues.
• Customizable Testing Parameters: Developers can customize test configurations to check specific accessibility guidelines.
• Detailed Reports: Generates detailed reports with explanations of each violation and recommendations for remediation.
• CI/CD Integration: Built for developers who want to automate accessibility tests via CI systems like Jenkins or TravisCI.

Pros:

• Free, open-source, and flexible with customizable test configurations.
• Ideal for developers looking to automate large-scale accessibility testing.

Cons:

• Command-line based, requiring technical expertise to set up and operate.
• Lacks visual feedback, making it less intuitive for non-developers.

10.Koa11y

Koa11y is a desktop application for macOS, Windows, and Linux that allows users to test websites for accessibility issues. It is designed to make it easy for non-technical users to generate accessibility reports, using tools like axe-core under the hood for testing against WCAG guidelines.

Key Features:

• Cross-Platform Desktop App: Runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux and makes it accessible to a wide range of users.
• Axe-core Integration: Utilizes axe-core to test web pages against WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
• PDF Reporting: Exports reports in PDF format and makes it easy to share findings with stakeholders or development teams
• Customizable Scans: Users can customize scans to test specific web pages or specific areas of a page.

Pros:

• User-friendly interface for non-developers.
• Available across multiple platforms.
• Generates shareable reports in an easy-to-read format.

Cons:

• Limited to testing individual pages; lacks site-wide crawling features.
• Not as easily integrated into CI/CD pipelines as some other tools.

11. Nu Html Checker (Validator.nu)

The Nu Html Checker (commonly known as Validator.nu) is an open-source tool that checks for both HTML validation and accessibility compliance. It primarily focuses on ensuring that HTML code follows the specifications laid out by the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). Although its primary function is HTML validation, it also offers accessibility testing functionalities by flagging code that may hinder users with disabilities.

Key Features:

• HTML5 Validation: Ensures your code is compliant with modern web standards and is correctly structured.
• Accessibility Checks: Warns about accessibility issues related to semantic HTML structure, ARIA roles, and more.
• Customizable: Offers customization options for selecting specific validation rules.
• Real-Time Validation: The tool can be integrated into development workflows for real-time HTML validation.

Pros:

• Highly focused on HTML and semantic accessibility, ensuring clean and compliant code.
• Supports integration with various development environments via APIs.
• Free and open-source.

Cons:

• Limited in scope compared to other tools, primarily focusing on HTML rather than broader accessibility checks.
• Requires developer knowledge to interpret and address certain validation warnings.

12. TPGI (formerly The Paciello Group)

TPGI offers a suite of accessibility tools and services, including automated testing, manual audits, and remediation support. Their tools are designed to help organizations comply with accessibility standards.

Key Features:

• Standout Product Features: Comprehensive audits, automated testing, manual assessments, ongoing support, training, and consulting services.
• Supported Platforms: Web-based, supports various operating systems and browsers.
• Customer Support: Extensive support, including email, phone, and live chat, detailed documentation, and training.
• Integrations: Integrates with various development and testing tools.

Pros:

• Comprehensive toolset, extensive support, and training, tailored solutions.

Cons:

• Custom pricing can be expensive and may require significant time investment to fully utilize​ (Accessibility Audits)​.

13. Siteimprove Accessibility Checker

Siteimprove Accessibility Checker is part of the broader Siteimprove platform, which provides a suite of web optimization tools. The accessibility checker is designed to analyze and improve the accessibility of websites, offering real-time insights into WCAG 2.1 compliance. It is widely used by enterprises and organizations with large, content-heavy websites.

Key Features:

• Browser Extension: Allows users to test individual pages within the browser and provides immediate feedback on accessibility issues.
• WCAG 2.1 Compliance: Ensures websites are aligned with the latest WCAG standards.
• Actionable Insights: Provides detailed reports with explanations of issues and how to fix them.
• Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitors websites to ensure ongoing accessibility compliance.

Pros:

• Offers detailed, easy-to-understand reports for developers and non-developers alike.
• Real-time feedback through a browser extension, which is convenient for quick checks.
• Enterprise-level support and features for large organizations.

Cons:

• Pricing can be high, making it less accessible to smaller teams or individual developers.
• Primarily focused on web-based content, offering limited functionality for other digital assets like documents or videos.

14. Ally.js

Ally.js is an open-source JavaScript library focused on improving the accessibility of web applications. Unlike traditional testing tools that identify issues, Ally.js helps developers implement and enhance accessibility features directly in their code, making it a unique tool in the accessibility landscape.

Key Features:

• Focus Management: Helps developers manage keyboard navigation and focus states across their web applications.
• Screen Reader Support: Provides utilities to make web applications more accessible to screen readers.
• Interactive Widgets: Allows for better management of accessibility for interactive components like modals, carousels, and popups.
• Customizable: Offers a high level of flexibility for developers to create custom accessibility solutions.

Pros:

• Ideal for improving accessibility in interactive web applications.
• Highly customizable and flexible for developers who need to create bespoke accessibility solutions.
• Open-source with an active community.

Cons:

• Requires a high level of developer knowledge, making it unsuitable for non-technical users.
• Focuses on accessibility enhancement rather than automated testing, which might require using additional tools for comprehensive audits.

15. ARC Toolkit

ARC Toolkit is a powerful browser-based accessibility testing tool developed by TPGi (The Paciello Group). It is available as a Chrome extension and is widely used for manual and automated accessibility testing. ARC Toolkit provides detailed insights into accessibility violations and is well-suited for developers and testers.

Key Features:

• Browser Extension: Allows for easy, on-the-fly accessibility checks within Chrome.
• WCAG 2.1 Audits: Tests web pages against WCAG 2.1 standards and provides detailed error reports.
• Visual Interface: Offers a user-friendly interface that highlights accessibility issues directly on the page.
• Customizable: Supports customization for testing specific elements or areas of a website.

Pros:

• Quick, browser-based accessibility audits make it convenient for real-time testing.
• Provides a clear visual representation of accessibility issues, which is helpful for developers and testers.
• Free to use, with advanced features available for enterprise-level users.

Cons:

• While the tool is highly effective for browser-based testing, it lacks broader support for mobile or other platforms.
• Primarily focused on manual testing, which can be time-consuming for large-scale projects.

What to look for in Accessibility Automation Tools?

When evaluating accessibility automation tools, there are several critical factors to consider, as these tools can vary in terms of features, functionality, and ease of use. Here are the key aspects to assess:

1. Standards Compliance:
Ensure the tool adheres to widely recognized accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, Section 508, or ARIA guidelines.
A robust tool should be capable of evaluating your website against these standards and providing clear explanations of violations and remediation steps.

2. Automation and Integration:
The best tools should offer seamless integration with your development pipeline, particularly with CI/CD systems like Jenkins, TravisCI, or GitHub Actions.
This ensures that accessibility testing can be automatically triggered with each code deployment, catching issues early.

3. Customizability:
Depending on the complexity of your web application, you may need to customize the testing process. Look for tools that allow for specific test cases, configurable rulesets, or the ability to write custom scripts.

4. Manual and Automated Testing:
A complete solution should support both automated and manual testing.
Automation can catch common issues, but manual testing is essential for more subjective assessments like visual design, navigation, or screen reader functionality.

5. Cross-Platform Testing and Device Testing:
Accessibility issues can manifest differently across devices and browsers. A good tool should allow you to test your website on multiple browsers and real devices, replicating real-world scenarios.

6. Reporting and Feedback:
Detailed reports that categorize issues based on severity and offer practical remediation advice are crucial.
Look for tools that provide not just raw data but also actionable insights for developers, designers, and content creators.

7. Scalability:
Whether you’re working on a small project or an enterprise-level site, the tool should be scalable to handle numerous pages and provide in-depth reports on site-wide accessibility.

How does BrowserStack help with Automated Accessibility Testing?

BrowserStack offers a comprehensive solution for automated accessibility testing, designed to fit seamlessly into modern development workflows. Here’s how the BrowserStack Accessibility tool approaches it:

1. Cross-Browser Testing and Real Device Testing:

BrowserStack enables accessibility testing on over 3,500 real browsers and devices. This ensures that websites are compliant across all platforms, capturing how accessibility issues might vary from one environment to another.

2. Lighthouse Integration:

By integrating Google Lighthouse, BrowserStack automates accessibility audits based on WCAG 2.1 guidelines. It scans the website for common accessibility issues, like missing alt text, low contrast ratios, or improper use of ARIA attributes.

These audits are reliable, as they are backed by Google’s widely respected web testing suite.

3. CI/CD Pipeline Integration:

BrowserStack makes it easy to run automated accessibility tests as part of your CI/CD pipeline.

Integration with popular tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and TravisCI ensures that accessibility checks are automatically triggered during development, catching issues before they reach production.

4. Real-Time Visual Feedback:

BrowserStack offers real-time, visual representations of accessibility issues, helping developers understand exactly where and how violations occur.

This enables quicker identification and issue resolution.

5. Scalability and Customization:

Whether you are a small startup or a large enterprise, BrowserStack’s accessibility tools scale to meet your needs.
Teams can run automated tests across multiple pages or even entire websites, ensuring every aspect is accessible to all users.

Combining real device testing, CI/CD integration, and detailed audits makes BrowserStack a powerful solution for automated accessibility testing.

Conclusion

Accessibility automation tools play a crucial role in ensuring that websites and apps are usable by everyone, regardless of their abilities. As the web becomes increasingly complex, automated tools help catch common accessibility violations early in the development cycle, minimizing the risk of non-compliance.

BrowserStack Accessibility stands out as a leading solution for automated accessibility testing. With features like real device testing, workflow analyzer, website scanner, assisted tests, centralized dashboard, and CI/CD pipeline integration, it provides a comprehensive approach for developers to ensure compliance with WCAG standards.

Ultimately, choosing the right accessibility automation tool depends on your team’s needs, the scale of your project, and the level of customization required. Regardless of the tool, the goal remains the same: to make the web more inclusive and accessible to all users.

Try BrowserStack Now