What is Headless Browser and Headless Browser Testing?

Headless, as the name suggests, means a Web Browser without a User Interface. Headless browser testing increases the efficiency of testing your web applications and provides ease of testing apps.

What is a Headless Browser?

We know that any software’s User Interface or UI is its most integral part. So, when it comes to Headless Browsers (Yep! You heard it right, it is called “headless”), it means a browser without a user interface or “head.” So, when the browser is headless, the GUI is hidden. Therefore, you can’t see anything when you use a headless browser to access any website. However, the program runs in the background.

• To elaborate, Headless Browser is just like any other browser, with the only difference being that nothing is visible on the screen.
• A headless browser is similar to a normal browser that performs functions such as navigating pages, clicking links, downloading content, and many more.
• But, with a normal browser, you can check each step and proceed with the help of a GUI presentation. At the same time, you will use Command-line or Console Interface to keep track of changes.

Headless Browser Examples

• Chromium
• Headless Chrome
• Firefox Headless
• Apple Safari (Webkit)
• Splash
• PhantomJS
• Zombie.JS
• HTML Unit

Importance Of Headless Browser

One clear advantage while using headless browsers is that they are faster than your typical browsers, as you can bypass all the time you take to load the CSS. But this is just one advantage.

Other benefits include:

• Scraping Websites: You can scrape the HTML of a website without rendering the full browser.
• Shorter Development Time: Checking the code changes for websites from the command line saves developers time and effort.
• Performance Monitoring with Headless Scripts: You can monitor the performance of network applications using headless browsers. Many developers automate screen capture of the website image to check the layouts of their website.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Headless Browser

Advantages of Headless Browsers

1. Resource Efficiency: Headless browsers don’t require the resources to render and display web content, such as graphical elements and animations. This makes them suitable for environments with limited resources.
2. Speed: Without rendering and displaying content, headless browsers can often load and interact with web pages more quickly than their GUI counterparts.
3. Scalability: They are easier to scale since they can run in the background without consuming graphical resources.
4. Automation: Ideal for automating interactions with web pages, such as filling out forms, clicking buttons, and navigating through pages.

Disadvantages of Headless Browsers

1. Lack of Visual Feedback: One of the most significant drawbacks of headless browsers is the need for a visual interface, making debugging and troubleshooting challenging.
2. Limited JavaScript Interactions: Some complex websites heavily rely on JavaScript to load and display content dynamically. Headless browsers have limitations in handling these dynamic interactions, leading to incomplete or inaccurate rendering.
3. Compatibility Issues: Headless browsers cannot replicate the behavior of real user agents or GUI-based browsers. This can lead to compatibility issues, where a website functions differently or behaves unexpectedly in a headless browser.
4. Maintenance: They require updates and maintenance to keep up with web technology changes and fix bugs or vulnerabilities like any other software.

What is Headless Browser Testing?

Developers have long relied on UI-driven testing to verify the functionality of their applications. However, this approach comes with several challenges, the most significant being stability. UI-driven tests often fail to interact properly with the browser. Another issue is the slow performance of these tests.

Headless browser testing addresses these problems. By running tests without loading the application’s user interface, headless testing speeds up the process. Since tests interact directly with the page, they eliminate instability and are more reliable, faster, and efficient.

When to Use Headless Browser Testing?

Depending on your testing goals, you may choose headless browser testing for your project. It is not resource-intensive, has scripted automation, is relatively weightless, and allows rapid execution. Moreover, you can write a UI test and integrate it with the build process instead of checking each of them manually, giving you better results.

Some cases where you may use headless browser testing are:

• Automation of HTML responses like form submission, mouse-clicking, etc.
• Handling JavaScript execution
• Scraping the content from the website
• Monitoring the network
• Handling Ajax Calls
• Generating screenshots of webpages

This was just the tip of the iceberg, and many more use-cases exist. However, you should know that headless browser testing has its usage, whereas normal testing has its own. Use the combination of the two to ensure you get the best of both worlds.

Frameworks used for Headless Browser Testing

Popular frameworks for headless browser testing include:

1. Selenium
2. Cypress
3. Playwright
4. Puppeteer
5. NightwatchJS

Here is a deeper look at these tools.

1. Selenium

Selenium is a free and open-source tool that is great for automation. It supports various browsers that run on different operating systems. Selenium web driver delivers enhanced support to dynamic web pages, and using Selenium headless can deliver great results. Moreover, you can use either Headless Chrome or Headless Firefox to execute the headless browser Selenium.

• Using Chrome for Selenium: With Chrome, you need Selenium WebDriver, which will provide you with a class called “ChromeOptions”. This class can provide headless configurations to your Chrome. Use the below code to create an instance for ChromeDriver.

ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions()
options.addArgument("headless");
ChromeDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);

With the addArgument() method, you can execute the headless mode from the ChromeOptions class delivered by the Selenium WebDriver.

• Using Firefox for Selenium:The process is similar to Headless Chrome, but you must set the path for GeckoDriver to execute in headless mode. With Selenium WebDriver, use the setHeadless(true) method of the FirefoxOptions class. Here’s the code to run in headless mode in Firefox.

FirefoxOptions options = new FirefoxOptions();
options.setHeadless(true);
WebDriver driver = new FirefoxDriver(options);
driver.get("https://demoqa.com/");
System.out.println("Title of the page is -> " + driver.getTitle());
driver.close();
}
}

2. Playwright

Playwright, for automating several browsers, has a high level of APIs. Before you set up Playwright for headless browser testing, ensure you have the latest versions of Node.JS and npm on your system. Create a package for this project using the command.

npm init --yes

You would be having package.json and run the given command to install Playwright on your system

npm install playwright@0.13.0

Take a look at a script to run that on a test website

const playwright = require('playwright');

(async () => {
const browser = await playwright.chromium.launch();
const page = await browser.newPage();
await page.goto('https://native-land.ca/');
await page.screenshot({ path: 'example.png' });

await browser.close();
})();
Or you can also use the following script-
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
test('basic test', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('https://playwright.dev/');
const title = page.locator('.navbar__inner .navbar__title');
await expect(title).toHaveText('Playwright');
});

Now run the following command as an example

npx playwright test

Moreover, it is recommended to disable headless mode when writing the first headless script. This allows you to see what the script is doing by running it with the user interface enabled.

3. Puppeteer

Puppeteer is undoubtedly one of the most popular headless frameworks out there. Similar to Playwright it comes with its own browser profile. Create a script to navigate to your test website by using the following code:

const puppeteer = require('puppeteer')
;(async () => {
const browser = await puppeteer.launch()
const page = await browser.newPage()
await page.goto('https://bstackdemo.com/')
await browser.close()
})()

Remember that by default, Puppeteer is running on headless mode, so you won’t see anything happening in the browser even if you are running your script.

Talk to an Expert

How to Execute Headless Browser Testing?

You can enable Headless Browser Testing using codes in different browsers. Here’s an example using Cypress:

If you wish to execute headless mode in Cypress, execute the command

cypress run

If you are looking to run only one specific document, you can pass that as an argument by using the “cypress run” command as given below,

cypress run --spec cypress/integration/example.spec.js

Below is a test script

{
"name": "sample-project",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Sample project for the Pinches of Cypress series",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "cypress run"
},
"keywords": ['cypress.io', 'testing', 'cypress'],
"author": "Walmyr Filho <wlsf82@gmail.com> (https://walmyr.dev)",
"license": "MIT",
"devDependencies": {
"cypress": "^6.4.0"
}
}

You can now have as many scripts as you want. For example

"scripts": {
"cypress:open": "cypress open",
"cypress:ci": "cypress run",
"cypress:smoke-test": "cypress run --spec cypress/integration/smoke-test.spec.js"
},

If the above commands are not npm scripts, adding npx as a prefix is necessary to execute them.

Conclusion

Headless browser testing offers a faster, more reliable, and efficient way to test web applications. However, using a real desktop browser provides a more accurate representation of how your website performs in a live environment. Depending on the testing scenario, switching between real and headless browsers can lead to more effective results.

Automation testing with Puppeteer enables testers to achieve this by quickly building and improving applications. By integrating Puppeteer with BrowserStack, QA teams can run parallel tests across real devices and browsers, expanding test coverage and ensuring higher accuracy in their testing process. This integration helps deliver better applications in less time, making it a powerful combination for web testing.

Run Puppeteer With BrowserStack Automate